In the Weekly Republican Address, newly-elected Sen. Scott Brown of Massachusetts explains that the Democrats running Washington have their priorities all wrong.
Leading up to today’s “National Coffee Party Day” – the countrywide launch of a leftwing movement meant as an answer to the tea parties – a CNN article asked, “Will the Coffee Party rise to the scale of the Tea Party movement? Saturday is the first big test.”
If “scale” is indeed the measure by which the Coffee Party will be graded, however, today’s cup-o’-Joe kickoff has earned a resounding “F.”
Despite a news-media buildup over the past few weeks from CNN, MSNBC, New York Times, National Public Radio, Washington Post, Seattle Times and dozens of other outlets, the estimated 350 coffee houses hosting events around the country today welcomed mostly miniscule crowds.
By contrast, Alex Pappas of the Daily Caller reports showing up to a Washington, D.C., coffee party at Peregrine Espresso in the Eastern Market area today, “only to find a small gathering of five activists huddled at a small table.”
As you will see in the article this YouTube is from a different Coffee Party.
SAN DIEGO — Investigators with Toyota Motor Corp. and the federal government could not replicate the runaway speeding reported by a Prius owner who said his car’s accelerator stuck as he drove on a California freeway, according to a memo for a congressional panel.
The memo, obtained Saturday by The Associated Press, said the experts who examined and test drove the car could not replicate the sudden, unintended acceleration James Sikes said he encountered.
A backup mechanism that shuts off the engine when the brake and gas pedals are floored also worked properly during tests. Sikes, 61, called 911 on Monday to report losing control of his 2008 Prius as the hybrid reached speeds of 94 mph. A California Highway Patrol officer helped Sikes bring the vehicle to a safe stop on Interstate 8 near San Diego. The incident happened at the worst possible time for Toyota, which has recalled millions of cars because of floor mats that can snag gas pedals or accelerators that can sometimes stick. Just hours before the incident, Toyota had called reporters to its Torrance, Calif. office to hear experts refute claims that the company had not identified — or fixed — what might be causing its cars to speed out of control. Sikes’ car was covered by the floor mat recall but not the one for sticky accelerators.
He later told reporters that he tried to pull on the gas pedal during his harrowing ride, but it didn’t “move at all.” During two hours of test drives of Sikes’ car Thursday, technicians with Toyota and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration failed to duplicate the same experience that Sikes described, according to the memo written by the Republican staff of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. One congressional staff member observed the investigation of Sikes’ Prius. “Every time the technician placed the gas pedal to the floor and the brake pedal to the floor the engine shut off and the car immediately started to slow down,” the memo said.
Also, the Prius is designed to shut down if the brakes are applied while the gas pedal is pressed to the floor. If it doesn’t, the engine would “completely seize,” according to the report that cited Toyota’s “residential Hybrid expert.” “It does not appear to be feasibly possible, both electronically and mechanically that his gas pedal was stuck to the floor and he was slamming on the brake at the same time,” according to the memo. The memo did say that investigators found the front brake pads were spent. “Visually checking the brake pads and rotor it was clearly visible that there was nothing left,” it said. John Gomez, Sikes’ attorney, said the findings fail to undermine his client’s story. “I don’t put a whole lot of stock in their explanation,” he said Sunday. “It’s not surprising they couldn’t replicate it.
They have never been able to replicate an incident of sudden acceleration. Mr. Sikes never had a problem in the three years he owned this vehicle.” Sikes is not trying to get famous or rich, Gomez said. The driver will not sue Toyota and is turning down media requests for interviews, he said. Regarding the brake wear, Gomez cited a CHP officer’s comment that brakes smelled as he chased Sikes on the freeway. The brake wear was not consistent with the brakes being applied at full force for a long period, the Wall Street Journal reported Saturday, citing three people familiar with the probe, whom it did not name. The newspaper said the brakes may have been applied intermittently.
Toyota Corp. spokesman Mike Michels declined to confirm the Journal’s report. He said the investigation was continuing and the company planned to release technical findings soon.
Full article here
[Congress will probably fine Toyota anyhow since they are in competition with Government Motors.]
The top House Republican says the GOP can defeat the Democratic health care bill that may reach the House floor this coming week.
Ohio Rep. John Boehner says Republicans alone can’t stop the legislation. But he says Republicans are “going to do everything we can to make it difficult for them, if not impossible, to pass the bill.”
Democrats hold a 253-178 majority in the House and need 216 votes for passage. Republicans are looking for help from some Democrats who are in tough re-election races and may vote “no.”
Boehner tells CNN’s “State of the Union” that Democrats never made a serious attempt to incorporate Republican ideas _ and only took “a couple of Republican bread crumbs and put them on top of their 2,700-page bill.”
I’ve seen more than a few boxes of Do-Si-Dos and Samoas around lately. It’s hard to look askance at the Girl Scouts when there’s so much sweetness in the air. But there is reason for keeping the Girl Scouts out of the “mom and apple pie” category. For one thing, the organization has a think tank, a nongovernmental organization and a welcome mat out to Planned Parenthood.
At a meeting of the United Nations Commission on the Status of Women this month, the World Association of Girl Scouts and Girl Guides held a session for young people in which the International Planned Parenthood Federation distributed a brochure about living with HIV titled “Healthy, Happy and Hot.” (Gratitude to U.N. watchdogs like C-FAM for keeping an eye out for such nefarious nonsense.)
The brochure sets itself up as a feel-good guide for dangerous behavior. “Young people living with HIV may feel that sex is just not an option, but don’t worry — many young people living with HIV live healthy, fun, happy and sexually fulfilling lives. You can, too, if you want to! Things get easier (and sex can get even better) as you become more comfortable with your status.”
And since there is considerable sexual advice offered, advice on “safe abortion” naturally follows in the brochure.
This presentation served as a backdrop for a joint statement from the several U.N. organizations making up the U.N. Adolescent Girls Task Force. The task force declares its support for programs “that empower … adolescent girls, particularly those aged 10 to 14 years.” No innocence preserved.
The United Nations doesn’t surprise me so much, but the Girl Scouts continue to greatly disappoint. About a decade ago, I wrote a piece for National Review called “The Cookie Crumbles,” about things that could surprise moms and dads helping their daughter work on her Brownie badges. While the Boy Scouts have been under attack by politically correct watchdogs, the Girl Scouts have escaped censure by embracing leftist politics, reproductive permissiveness and secularism. It’s been a long slide to sex-prep work for the U.N.
The Girl Scouts aren’t shy about the causes they embrace. A 2008 post-election survey of girls and boys between 13 and 17 initiated by the Girl Scouts’ think tank, the Girl Scout Research Institute, found overwhelming support for then President-elect Barack Obama, and noted concern for a laundry list of international and domestic issues, including the war in Iraq, the economy and “the difficulties women face in reaching leadership positions in our country.”
I don’t mind an arm of the Girl Scouts gathering information. But I do mind a group we associate with Tagalongs, tying knots, and basic life skills — with protecting the innocence of children in an otherwise hyper-sexualized and politically fraught culture — doing exactly the opposite. I mind leftist activists at national conventions. I mind faux empowerment laced with the persistent whine of victimization.
Your local Girl Scout troop may be run by traditional God-fearing women who want nothing to do with radical Planned Parenthood seminars, but you should know what’s going on at the top. And if you are looking for alternatives, they’re out there. In recent years I’ve encountered the American Heritage Girls, established by a Cincinnati-based former Girl Scout troop leader, which seeks to “Build women of integrity through service to God, family, community and country.” And in a country known for entrepreneurship, a few sensible moms can start their own skill-building groups, very far away from the United Nations and Planned Parenthood; anything that allows girls to just be girls.
Old Mother Hubbard
Went to the cupboard,
To give the poor dog a bone:
When she came there,
The cupboard was bare,
And so the poor dog had none.
Poor doggie. If Mother Hubbard went to the cupboards of some hospitals in the U.K. today, she’d find plenty of bones though still in living bodies. We hope. The NHS is having some money problems. Oh, and by hospital “cupboards” they mean mop closets.
No, we sure wouldn’t want to maintain the status quo with our health care system in the U.S. Medicare and Medicaid are going to bankrupt us. Private insurers keep raising their premiums and denying coverage to people. The solution from Obama and the Democrats is government intervention to turn the screws on private insurers and “keep them honest”. Ultimately, a single payer system will solve everything. Just a matter of time.
You’d think we’re the only country experiencing a health care crisis since we’re the ones so backward about universal health care. Actually, most major economies are having a health care crisis right along with us.
It just goes to show that however perfectly a health system is designed, funded and organised, it is always going to have its problems. Right now, the health services of all advanced economies – good, bad, and ugly together – face a common challenge. The demographic time-bomb of baby-boomers about to hit the age of maximum health care cost has pretty much made all of them fiscally unsustainable. Either we are going to have to pay a whole lot more for our health care, or it will have to be rationed.
So how does a system that is already government run handle a health care crisis? The NHS instituted drastic cutbacks including reducing the number of hospital beds and curtailing medical procedures. Something will have to be done about the elderly too. A recommendation will be made to the NHS to provide “a minimum level of service” to the elderly.
More patients will be treated in hospital cupboards if further planned bed cuts are given the green light, a health pressure group warned on Tuesday.
Health Emergency chairman Geoff Martin made the comments following a Nursing Times survey that revealed over 60 per cent of nurses were aware of patients being routinely treated in mop cupboards, TV rooms and corridors.
The poll of more than 900 nurses showed almost 80 per cent believed this resulted in patient safety being put at risk and 29 per cent admitted it happened every day.
Nurses highlighted specific issues around safety with senior staff, including patients having no access to call bells or water, as well as a lack of emergency equipment and fire exits being blocked.
Hospitals being “full” and a fear that the government’s four-hour A&E target for patients to be seen will not be met, leading to unnecessary hospital admissions, were some of the reasons given for why non-clinical areas had to be used.
But Mr Martin warned of much worse to come if planned bed cuts, including over 30 per cent of the current capacity in London, were bulldozed through.
He said: “If NHS London get its way, a third of the current hospital beds in the capital will be ripped out of the system at a time when nurses are already making it clear that the crisis is so severe that patients are being treated in cupboards and that hospitals are dangerously short of capacity.” The Patients Association charity director Katherine Murphy said: “Not only is this potentially unsafe, but it is completely undignified.
If you need a tooth pulled or a hysterectomy, you probably won’t be put in the mop closet. You may not wind up in the dental chair or an operating room either.
More than a third of Primary Care Trusts, which fund hospitals in England, are running deficits which have led to a cutbacks in operations and calls to close casualty departments, the report said. [...] Patients are already suffering from the deficit, the report said. GPs in one area have been told they must seek “approval” for a list of procedures including hysterectomies, removal of “skin lumps and bumps” and tooth extraction.
Bosses have advised that “it is usually better to wait to see if symptoms resolve themselves”, according to the report.
That sounds reasonable. Don’t be such a sissy running out for a tooth extraction or a hysterectomy before you know you really need it. Waiting for the pain to go away is much better than giving up premium cable to pay for higher health insurance premiums.
Being in a mop closet doesn’t necessarily mean you’ll get any care.
PATIENTS were “routinely neglected” at a hospital where managers became obsessed with cost-cutting and Government targets, an inquiry has damningly concluded.
Maybe they aren’t being neglected. Maybe everyone is waiting around to see if the problems go away, like when you’re dead.
Stafford Hospital was ranked among the best in Britain – having been awarded a coveted foundation status in 2008. But on closer inspection things are not so rosy.
For the previous six years, it had had one of the highest mortality rates in the country. The Royal College of Nursing believes this could only happen because the criterion used to decide which hospitals are awarded foundation status does not focus closely enough on patient safety.
“It’s definitely more than a local problem, it comes from the government it really does. It comes from the targets they put in place,” [says a family member of a patient]. “The hospitals will do absolutely anything to meet the targets and even more to get foundation status.”
Anyone who looks to government to solve the problem of health care costs should remember Old Mother Hubbard.
She went to the baker’s
To buy him some bread;
When she came back
The dog was dead!
When Barack Obama was sworn in as president, he chose the Bible that Abraham Lincoln used on which to take the oath of office.
A little over a year later, as President Obama strong-arms House and Senate Democrats to pass a health-care bill that will nationalize 17 percent of our economic lives – a bill that Americans don’t want – we ought to recall Lincoln’s famous words at Gettysburg.
Dedicating the final resting place for those who fought there, Lincoln appealed that we not let up in the struggle for “government
of the people, by the people and for the people.”
Democrats may soon show, if we let them, that the American ideal of representative government – government of a nation, in Lincoln’s words, “conceived in Liberty” – is lost.
Bending rules into a procedural pretzel, Democrats will attempt to pass one of the largest government takeovers of private American lives in history without a single Republican vote and, against the will of the people. Obama will sign it into law.
Democrat pollsters Pat Caddell and Doug Schoen write in the Washington Post, “… a solid majority of Americans oppose the massive health-care reform plan.”
Pollster.com, which reports an average of all polls, shows that now for the first time disapproval for President Obama exceeds approval – 48.8 to 47.5 percent.
According to Gallup, just 21 percent of Americans are satisfied with the direction of the country, down 10 points from spring of last year when the health-care reform push began.
And, per the latest from the Pew Research Center, only 13 percent of Americans view health care as “our most important problem.”
But this isn’t about logic. Mr. Obama and his colleagues on Capitol Hill perceive a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to grasp the holy grail of the left and realize the dream of transforming America into a European-style welfare state. Democracy – what the American people actually want – is just not going to stand in the way.
It isn’t just about Republican opposition. Nancy Pelosi must persuade, bribe and threaten to get 216 House Democrats to support this despite having 253 sitting House Democrats.
Speaking the other day in Missouri, Obama mocked Republicans who want to stop this train and begin the process over.
But Warren Buffett, the legendary investor and one of the nation’s wealthiest men – himself a Democrat – said the same thing in an interview on CNBC.
Buffett said we should “start over.” And he said, correctly, that the main health-care problem is runaway costs and that the bill the president is pushing “unfortunately … doesn’t attack the cost situation that much.”
Yet, in his remarks in Missouri, the president said, “Let me tell you, we’ve incorporated almost every serious idea from across the political spectrum about how to contain rising health-care costs. There’s not an idea out there that we have not worked on, that we have not included in this proposal.”
At the recent White House health-care summit, Rep. Paul Ryan challenged with clarity the massive accounting gimmicks and hallucinatory economic assumptions Democrats have used to present this massive budget-busting disaster of a bill as a prudent deficit-cutting measure.
Ryan, speaking for Republicans, showed that the 10-year costs are in reality $2.3 trillion, rather than under a trillion as claimed. It’s all been ignored.
In the one laboratory experiment we have – Massachusetts – which enacted a state plan similar to what Democrats want for the nation, premiums are now the highest in the nation, and per-capita health expenditures are 27 percent higher than the national average.
Every freedom-loving American patriot who cares about our future should be on the phone today to their senators and congressmen saying “stop.”
The new Obama Fed is going to be very dovish when it comes to fighting future inflation and defending the value of the dollar.
The president has nominated Janet Yellen to be vice chair of the Federal Reserve. Ms. Yellen is a distinguished economist who unfortunately subscribes to the Phillips-curve model that trades off unemployment and inflation. In other words, rather than excess money creation as the cause of rising prices, she focuses on the unemployment rate, the volume of new jobs being created, and the growth of the overall economy. For Ms. Yellen, inflation is caused by too many people working and too much economic prosperity.
And since we have the opposite problem today — high unemployment and too few people working — she will be the last Fed governor to turn out the lights on the central bank’s zero interest rate.
There is no evidence in Ms. Yellen’s public opinions or speeches that she might use a market-price rule — targeting commodities, gold, bond rates, or the dollar — as a forward-looking inflation (or deflation) signal. So the absence of a commodity- or dollar-price rule will continue at the Fed. Ben Bernanke doesn’t use a market-price rule, and Obama’s additional Fed appointees — whoever they are — will undoubtedly come from the same Phillips-curve camp.
Supply-siders like myself who believe that only market prices can provide accurate signals of the supply and demand for money are going to be very disappointed. If the Fed supplies more cash than markets want, the inflation rate can go up whether unemployment is high or low. We learned this painfully in the 1970s, when high unemployment was accompanied by high inflation.
Even more troubling, fiscal policies coming out of Washington will reduce the investment demand for money. This is because tax rates on those individuals, families, and entrepreneurs who are most likely to save and invest are going up. Rather than extending the Bush marginal-tax-rate cuts on capital gains and other forms of investment, Washington will let that tax relief expire at the end of this year.
On top of this, Obamacare proposes to apply the 2.9 percent Medicare payroll tax on ordinary labor income to capital gains, dividends, interest, and profits from passive investments in partnerships and S-corporation small businesses.
Saving and investment are already double-taxed several times over. This includes the inheritance tax, which is slated to rise substantially next year. But taxing successful investors and earners is the exact wrong policy. Continued…
Megan McArdle – Megan McArdle is the business and economics editor for The Atlantic. She has worked at three start-ups, a consulting firm, an investment bank, a disaster recovery firm at Ground Zero, and the Economist.
Mar 12 2010, 2:56 PM ET
One of the great mysteries of the Toyota debacle is why Toyota ignored the complaints for so long. Or at least it’s a mystery to reporters on cable news, abetted by consumer advocates who were all too happy to imply that Toyota didn’t care how many people it killed as long as they made a profit.
Maybe so, but I doubt it; you don’t usually make a profit by killing your customers. It’s too risky, in this age of nosy regulators and angry consumer activists.
Their behavior becomes a bit more explicable when you consider this argument from Ted Frank:
The Los Angeles Times recently did a story detailing all of the NHTSA reports of Toyota “sudden acceleration” fatalities, and, though the Times did not mention it, the ages of the drivers involved were striking.
In the 24 cases where driver age was reported or readily inferred, the drivers included those of the ages 60, 61, 63, 66, 68, 71, 72, 72, 77, 79, 83, 85, 89–and I’m leaving out the son whose age wasn’t identified, but whose 94-year-old father died as a passenger.
These “electronic defects” apparently discriminate against the elderly, just as the sudden acceleration of Audis and GM autos did before them. (If computers are going to discriminate against anyone, they should be picking on the young, who are more likely to take up arms against the rise of the machines and future Terminators).
In the original Sudden Acceleration Incident craze that afflicted America in the late eighties, the National Highway Safety Transportation Administration eventually ruled that the problem was “pedal misapplication”, aka stepping on the gas when you meant to step on the brake. These incidents were highly correlated with three things: being elderly, being short, and parking (or leaving a parking space). The elderly are more prone to the sort of neuronal misfiring described in yesterday’s New York Times. Shorter people have to hunt more for the pedals. And starting up from a complete stop is the most likely time to press the wrong pedal.
In Saturday’s Washington Post, Joel Benenson, lead pollster for the White House, has published a response to an op-ed by Democratic strategists Pat Caddell and Doug Schoen, who argued Friday that the Democratic party’s “blind persistence” in the “march of folly” for health care reform will lead to an “electoral rout” in November.
Not so, says Benenson. The American public is, in fact, “closely divided when it comes to supporting or opposing various health-care plans.” As proof, Benenson cites a recent Washington Post poll showing that 49 percent of those surveyed oppose the current Democratic health care proposal, while 46 percent support it. (The Post poll also found that 60 percent say the Democratic plan is too complicated, 59 percent say it’s too expensive, and 74 percent say they trust their insurance company to handle their claims fairly — but never mind.)
Benenson says the Post results are reliable because they are “consistent with eight of the 12 most recent independent public polls reported on Pollster.com.” Which leads to a question: You’re looking at the last dozen polls on something. Why throw four of them out? And even then, do the remaining eight polls really support your case?
The answer is no. If you look at the 12 most recent independent polls on Pollster.com, you’ll find every one of them shows that more people oppose health care reform than support it, and most of the polls show a significantly wider margin of opposition than Benenson suggests.
By Tom Blumer (Bio | Archive)
Fri, 03/12/2010 – 23:16 ET
April Castro and the headline writers at the supposedly “objective” Associated Press are obviously not pleased with changes the Texas State Board of Education made to the Lone Star State’s social studies curriculum.
Castro’s report (HT to an NB e-mailer) makes almost no attempt to hide her clear disdain. She includes references to a “far-right faction” (a “faction” that happened to constitute a two-thirds majority!) and “ultraconservatives,” while uniformly describing leftists as mere Democrats, and generally comes across as a sore loser in solidarity with the poor, outvoted libs.
You’ll also see in the excerpt that follows that the story’s headline is disgracefully over the top:
Texas ed board vote reflects far-right influences
AUSTIN, Texas — A far-right faction of the Texas State Board of Education succeeded Friday in injecting conservative ideals into social studies, history and economics lessons that will be taught to millions of students for the next decade.
Teachers in Texas will be required to cover the Judeo-Christian influences of the nation’s Founding Fathers, but not highlight the philosophical rationale for the separation of church and state. Curriculum standards also will describe the U.S. government as a “constitutional republic,” rather than “democratic,” and students will be required to study the decline in value of the U.S. dollar, including the abandonment of the gold standard.
“We have been about conservatism versus liberalism,” said Democrat Mavis Knight of Dallas, explaining her vote against the standards. “We have manipulated strands to insert what we want it to be in the document, regardless as to whether or not it’s appropriate.”
…. Ultraconservatives wielded their power over hundreds of subjects this week, introducing and rejecting amendments on everything from the civil rights movement to global politics. Hostilities flared and prompted a walkout Thursday by one of the board’s most prominent Democrats, Mary Helen Berlanga of Corpus Christi, who accused her colleagues of “whitewashing” curriculum standards.
By late Thursday night, three other Democrats seemed to sense their futility and left, leaving Republicans to easily push through amendments heralding “American exceptionalism” and the U.S. free enterprise system, suggesting it thrives best absent excessive government intervention.
Castro should have been asking why the items described in the excerpt, plus the following cited by the AP writer in unexcerpted paragraphs, haven’t been in the social studies curriculum all along:
“… the origins of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and its impact on global politics.”
former Israeli Prime Minister Golda Meir.
“a reference to the Second Amendment right to bear arms in a section about citizenship in a U.S. government class.”
Apparently the ultimate insult occurred when “Conservatives beat back multiple attempts to include hip-hop as an example of a significant cultural movement.”
This headline in the Washington Post seemed like a pleasant surprise: “Rise in Washington Area Unemployment Seen as Good Sign for Economy’s Recovery.”
The logic seems unassailable: The District of Columbia is the hub of the political class. Higher unemployment in Washington and vicinity thus means fewer parasites feeding off the productive economy, which augurs well for recover[y]. But we wouldn’t have expected to read it in the Washington Post.
Turns out we would have been right, for it turns out the story actually says that higher unemployment in Washington is a sign of prosperity in Washington:
Unemployment rates rose in the District, Maryland and Virginia in January, a shift that economists said could be a positive sign for the economy because it suggests that discouraged job-seekers are feeling more optimistic about their prospects and have resumed looking for work.
So what looks to the Post like good news that looks like bad news is actually bad news that looks like good news.