Archive for the ‘Voices of the 18th Congressional District’ Category
« Older Entries |
Friday, February 26th, 2010
Divide and conquer is a method that predates recorded history. Generals use it, politicians use it and good CEO’s use it. If an opposing general can prevent your support troops and reinforcements from getting to you, he has a smaller fight. If a CEO can take away a block of your customers by offering a competitive product then they will end up buying more of your products.
Democrats have used it effectively for about 4 decades. Bill Clinton used it frequently. They divide the country into racial groups, income groups, ethnic groups, religious groups and work to win over each group individually. They offer something for everyone. All things to all people. Some people believe them.
“You can fool some of the people all of the time; you can fool all of the people some of the time, but you can never fool all of the people all of the time.” In politics you just need to fool enough to get you over that majority of votes margin. So tell them what they want to hear then ignore them after the election.
Hannity asked Sarah Palin last night if she thought “TEA Party” candidates were a good thing. She replied that working to improve the Republican Party is the way to go.
When a third party runs a candidate they are doing the divide and conquer on behalf of the opposition. Doing their work for them. It helped get Obama elected in 2008. He received 53%. People who were disappointed that their favored candidate was not the general election candidate either voted for the opposing party’s candidate or stayed home. It only took 3.1% of voters to get Obama elected.
So in effect they created another division, unhappy Republicans and Independents. Do your complaining and support your candidate in the primary elections. I mention complaining because complaining at the right time and in a constructive manner is good. It can be informative and cause people to think. In the general election support the candidate that you dislike least. There has never been a perfect candidate that met everyone’s list of ideal traits.
I want you to vote for John Faulk in the primary in Texas. However, I believe you should vote your conscience. But after John Faulk wins the primary ( which we know he will, right!) then support him in the general election or we’ll have another couple years of Sheila Jackson Lee.
Tags: Barack Obama, Congress, Election 2010, Houston Voters
Posted in National Issues, Voices of the 18th Congressional District | No Comments »
Friday, February 26th, 2010
Don’t forget to vote John Faulk for CD-18 today!
Just a quick reminder that today is the final day of early voting for the Republican Primary.
If you have not yet voted, grab two friends at lunch and get to the nearest polling place.
Locations can be found here: http://www.harrisvotes.com/docs/EV/earlyvotinglocations_schedule_ENG.pdf
Thank you again for your support and your vote.
|
|
|
Sincerely,

John Faulk
Faulk for Congress
1701 Hermann Dr # 2206
Houston, TX 77004
832-265-4074
|
|
Tags: Election 2010, Houston Voters, John Faulk, Texas 18th Congressional District
Posted in Democrats For John Faulk, Houston, John Faulk, Voices of the 18th Congressional District | No Comments »
Wednesday, February 3rd, 2010
I understand that Brenda Page recently sent out a communiqué regarding her qualifications to represent the residents of the 18th Congressional District.
After reading it again, I am a little dismayed to see Ms. Page resort to identity politics. She states:
“Democrats are running three attorneys, one woman and two males. Brenda Page is the only Republican woman attorney in this contest.”
I was hoping this race would be about the issues and how the people of CD18 are best served. Issues like shrinking the size of Government, reducing taxes and protecting our nation from all enemies. If Ms. Page truly thinks a female attorney is the best choice for CD18, then why not keep Sheila Jackson Lee?
Also in her email, Ms. Page states:
“…Brenda is a fiscal and social conservative who embraces the Republican platform…”
In light of the “Massachusetts Miracle” and the clear message sent to Washington, the people of CD18 will demand more than just another RINO. They deserve a conservative constitutionalist. There is a difference and I make it very clear on my website at www.faulkforcongress.org. There, I have stated my position on over 20 issues. To put it bluntly, and in the words of Ronald Reagan (neither a woman nor an attorney):
“There are no limits to growth and human progress when men and women are free to follow their dreams.”
I encourage you to look at my website, call me or send me a note if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
John Faulk
john@faulkforcongress.org
www.faulkforcongress.org
I understand that Brenda Page recently sent out a communiqué regarding her qualifications to represent the residents of the 18th Congressional District.
After reading it again, I am a little dismayed to see Ms. Page resort to identity politics. She states:
“Democrats are running three attorneys, one woman and two males. Brenda Page is the only Republican woman attorney in this contest.”
I was hoping this race would be about the issues and how the people of CD18 are best served. Issues like shrinking the size of Government, reducing taxes and protecting our nation from all enemies. If Ms. Page truly thinks a female attorney is the best choice for CD18, then why not keep Sheila Jackson Lee?
Also in her email, Ms. Page states:
“…Brenda is a fiscal and social conservative who embraces the Republican platform…”
In light of the “Massachusetts Miracle” and the clear message sent to Washington, the people of CD18 will demand more than just another RINO. They deserve a conservative constitutionalist. There is a difference and I make it very clear on my website at www.faulkforcongress.org. There, I have stated my position on over 20 issues. To put it bluntly, and in the words of Ronald Reagan (neither a woman nor an attorney):
“There are no limits to growth and human progress when men and women are free to follow their dreams.”
I encourage you to look at my website, call me or send me a note if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
John Faulk
john@faulkforcongress.org
www.faulkforcongress.org
Posted in John Faulk, News releases, Voices of the 18th Congressional District | No Comments »
Monday, November 16th, 2009
Inflated jobs by state -
More than ten percent of the jobs the Obama administration has claimed were “created or saved” by the $787 billion stimulus package are doubtful or imaginary, according to reports compiled from eleven major newspapers and the Associated Press.
Based only on our analysis of stimulus media coverage in the last two weeks, The Examiner has created this interactive map to document exaggerated stimulus claims. The map, which will be updated as new revelations appear, currently reflects an exaggeration by the Obama administration of about 75,000 jobs, out of the 640,000 jobs supposedly “created or saved.”
The map reflects reports from The Wall Street Journal, The Boston Globe, the Sacramento Bee, The New York Times, USA Today, the Las Vegas Sun, the Detroit Free Press, the New York Post, the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel, the Associated Press, the Chicago Tribune, and the Atlanta Journal-Constitution. It remains a work in progress because relatively few newspapers have scrutinized stimulus spending so far.
The Obama administration has claimed that the $787 billion economic stimulus package “saved or created” some 650,000 jobs. But almost as soon as the White House trotted out this figure, news organizations found huge exaggerations in the reported data. Many of the jobs reportedly created do not exist or cannot be accounted for.
Use arrows on upper left of map to zero in on an area.
Tags: Barack Obama, Congress, economy, Stimulus not effective, unemployment
Posted in National Issues, The U.S. Government, Voices of the 18th Congressional District | No Comments »
Monday, November 16th, 2009
Americans are reasonably happy with their health care and the insurance that pays for it and are not worried that some event, such as losing a job, will interfere with their access to doctors or hospitals, according to a poll taken Oct. 29-Nov. 9 for The Associated Press.
Overall, though, they are slightly more concerned about the economy than health care, with 91 percent rating the economy as extremely or very important, and 81 percent rating health care as extremely or very important.
Eighty-six percent of those surveyed favor making sure all Americans get the health care they need. But when the questions include a mention that such coverage would likely result in higher health insurance premiums, the numbers change.
Forty-three percent would favor a law barring insurance companies from refusing coverage to someone who has a pre-existing condition, and 57 percent say they would support prohibiting insurance companies from refusing to renew coverage for people with a serious illness.
But they are evenly divided on their opinion toward President Obama’s approach to the health care issue, with 47 percent approving and 47 percent disapproving.
Fifty-one percent of the poll’s respondents say the health care coverage most Americans now have is excellent or good.
Tags: Barack Obama, Congress, health insurance, Healthcare Availability, national healthcare, socialized medicine
Posted in National Issues, The U.S. Government, Voices of the 18th Congressional District | No Comments »
Wednesday, November 4th, 2009
From Walter Williams latest article:
Steve H. Hanke is a Professor of Applied Economics at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore and Senior Fellow at the Cato Institute in Washington, D.C., and writes frequently for Globe Asia and Forbes magazine.
…
Professor Hanke argues that the chief enabler of both the Great Depression and our latest economic downturn is the Federal Reserve Bank, who sees itself as America’s systemic risk regulator. This is the world upside down, Hanke explains: The Federal Reserve is the systemic risk.
It is hard to prescribe a government remedy when no one knows the real sources of the problem. Congress doesn’t have enough oversight of the Fed and I’d like to help change that.
Click here for Walter Williams’ full article
Tags: Barack Obama, Congress, economics, Federal Reserve, Recession, unemployment
Posted in National Issues, The U.S. Government, Voices of the 18th Congressional District | No Comments »
Monday, November 2nd, 2009
Harris County Tax Office Vindicated, but TDP and Houston Chronicle Spin It Otherwise
In the settlement, representatives of the Tax Assessor-Collector’s Office admitted no wrongdoing, and fundamentally changed nothing about its operations. Nonetheless, the TDP claimed a victory, and the Houston Chronicle today praised the non-decision in an editorial.
Republican / Libertarian Alliance
“We’ll work with anybody that we feel is in agreement with our core beliefs,” said Pat Dixon, Libertarian Party of Texas chairman said of the growing alliance between the groups represented by the Tea Parties. “I think when there are ideas of economic freedom” the alliance makes sense.
Related Story: What Is a Republican and What Is A Libertarian?
Dallas Judge Throws Out Gay-Marriage Ban
A Dallas District Judge today ruled the state’s ban on gay marriage is unconstitutional. Ruling in a case of two gay men married outside of Texas seeking a divorce, state District Judge Tena Callahan ruled that the ban, enacted by the voters of Texas four years ago violates the U.S. Constitution’s guarantee of equal protection under law.
Lots more here
Tags: Barack Obama, Congress, economy, Environmental Issues, First Amendment Rights, health insurance, Marriage, national healthcare, personal responsibility, Taxes
Posted in Houston, National Issues, News releases, The U.S. Government, Voices of the 18th Congressional District | No Comments »
Monday, November 2nd, 2009
In the last years of the Vietnam War American troops were kept in the villages making them safe. This deprived the Viet Cong of food and shelter. It also emboldened the local people to join local militias and defend their territory.
In Iraq when the surge troops went in it had the same effect. Our troops stayed in the towns and villages making them safe and gaining the support of the people. The local men then felt safe joining the Iraqi army and police forces. The people also felt safe from retaliation for giving intelligence information to our forces.
It also worked in the American Civil War in reverse. I watched a documentary on one of the History Channels Friday night on the show “The Conquerors”. It was about General Sherman. The story had a narrator and a number of historians were interviewed throughout the show. The gist of it was Sherman was bothered by the million plus soldiers (both sides) killed before his “March to the Sea”. He wanted to destroy the South’s will to fight.
Many powerful people in the South still thought they could win. I guess they had visions of getting Northern booty.
Confederate President Jefferson Davis and General Robert E. Lee both having lived up north knew of the industry up there. The north could grow food and raise cattle. It had plenty of factories to build weapons, wagons and trains and lots of immigrants because of the factories.
The south was predominately agricultural and had to rely on importing equipment from Europe.
It was fairly obvious before the war that the North would win (according to historians).
So Sherman decided that by marching his 60,000 strong army to Savannah he would show that the Union Army could go anywhere it wanted. He didn’t order his troops to destroy everything in their path but he refrained from stopping them. When his army approached the city of Middleton, the Capital of Georgia at the time, he told them do not destroy anything. They kept it in tact. He occupied the City and lived in the Capital Building for 2 weeks before moving on to Savannah for symbolism. He had arranged before hand for re-supply ships to meet him at Savannah.
The result of his march was it demoralized the South and it demoralized the southern troops fighting further up north in Maryland, Virginia, Pennsylvania, etc. The troops were worried about the safety of their families back home. Same as the Vietnamese soldiers (Vietnamese soldiers were known to desert if they were sent to areas far from their homes) and the Afghan Government army.
Sherman’s hated March to the Sea was effective and helped end the war sooner.
By sending the necessary troops to Afghanistan we can provide safety in the villages 24/7 and increase the size and effectiveness of the Afghani Army in the war. The Afghanis are fighting to defend their homeland from al Qaeda and their tribal territory from the Taliban. They have a vested interest.
I have to state that as a retired accountant I don’t have the personal expertise to critique the information I am relaying to you. Although I believe the information is true if the documentary is true and if the books and articles I have read are true.
Tags: Afghanistan, Barack Obama, More troops, National Security
Posted in National Issues, The U.S. Government, Voices of the 18th Congressional District | No Comments »
Wednesday, October 28th, 2009
Group to push for fashion gathering in D.C.
(All Democrats)
As of now, the idea for such a caucus has garnered much support from multiple House representatives, including Diane Watson (D-Calif.), Carolyn Maloney (D-N.Y.), Kendrick Meek (D-Fla.), Sheila Jackson-Lee (D-Texas), Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-D.C.), Chaka Fattah (D-Penn.), Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.) and House Judiciary committee chairman John Conyers (D-Mich.).
The fashion industry might be coming to Washington D.C., and this time, not only to Michelle Obama’s wardrobe.
The Greater Washington Fashion Chamber of Commerce (GWFCC) is working to create an official fashion caucus which could mean great things for the industry.
According to a report from New York Magazine, the basic goal for such a caucus would be to give the fashion district a voice so the issues effecting the industry can be heard by those who can make a difference.
Working behind the GWFCC would be various lawmakers who have an interest in the industry and who can represent it’s needs. These lawmakers stand as the voice for the industry in regards to the national matters that affect it.
Christine Brooks-Cropper, president of the GWFCC, spoke about the possible issues the caucus could tackle, according to Women’s World Daily Magazine.
These issues include creating a fashion endowment fund to provide scholarships for fashion students, getting more momentum behind the Design Piracy Prohibition Act, which gives three years of copyright protection to designs and attempting to revive and save New York City’s Garment District.
Click here for full story
You know what happens when government gets involved! Taxpayers pay for it and politicians control it.
Tags: Congress, economy, government control, socialism
Posted in National Issues, News releases, Sheila Jackson Lee, The U.S. Government, Voices of the 18th Congressional District | No Comments »
Wednesday, October 28th, 2009
This is why government should stay out of business! My solution would be to increase/raise the lease payment from the users who in turn will raise the ticket prices. Sheila Jackson Lee is so concerned about the NFL perhaps she should concentrate on TX 18 Congressional District issues and business contracts.
“Sports Authority May Need Taxpayer Rescue” Houston Chronicle
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/metropolitan/6687627.html
: Harris County taxpayers may have to inject up to $7 million a year
: into the Harris County-Houston Sports Authority for the next two
: years due to a financial crisis sparked by the souring of bonds
: used to build Minute Maid Park, Reliant Stadium and the Toyota
: Center.
: Facing balloon payments on $117 million in variable-rate bonds, the
: authority now is obliged to pay off the debt in five years instead
: of 23 years. That would require $24 million a year a figure that,
: together with more than $30 million in additional obligations,
: would push the authority to the brink of insolvency.
: The alternative: Convince major banks to provide lines of credit
: that would give the authority a two-year window to refinance. That
: would cost $7 million a year.
: But those deals would create a new set of problems: The authority
: would have to take $7 million a year now used for stadium
: maintenance and the expenses of the Harris County Sports and
: Convention Corporation and spend it on repaying the loans. To make
: up the difference, Harris County may have to pick up some of those
: expenses with property tax revenue, a step that some say indirectly
: violates stadium boosters’ promise that taxpayer dollars would not
: be used to pay for the new venues.
: Using that $7 million to pay debt would create a budget hole for
: the convention corporation, one that would have to be filled by
: Harris County, Sports and Convention Corp. Executive Director
: Willie Loston said.
: The Authority’s chairman, however, said taxpayers will not be
: affected.
: “What’s happened in the financial world has clearly created
: additional problems for the sports authority,” said J. Kent
: Friedman, chairman of the authority board. “But no matter what
: happens here, there’s absolutely no way the taxpayers of Harris
: County or the city of Houston could be negatively impacted.”
: Friedman said that even in a worst-case scenario in which the
: authority cannot make its payments, that failure would not impact
: taxpayers, only investors in its bonds.
: Troubled debt
: The sports authority was set up to manage the $1 billion in
: voter-approved bonds that financed the construction of Reliant
: Stadium, Toyota Center and Minute Maid Park.
: The authority’s debt ran into trouble about a year ago when MBIA, a
: firm that insured its bonds, was downgraded by analysts. Investors
: fled from $117 million in variable-rate bonds, forcing the bank
: JPMorgan Chase to buy them up, under its contractual obligation
: with the sports authority. JPMorgan then converted the debt into a
: loan and, per the contract, required payment in five years instead
: of 23. Those payments amount to about $24 million a year.
: After expenses and debt service, the authority nets about
: $12 million annually.
: In addition, the authority had entered into an interest rate swap
: on the $117 million with UBS, which allowed the agency to exchange
: its variable interest rates for fixed ones. When the bonds soured,
: the swap went awry, creating an obligation for the authority to
: post $30 million to $35 million in collateral.
: Without a lifeline, the two payments, which could total nearly
: $60 million, would deplete most of the authority’s reserve funds
: and push it toward default.
: Because investor ratings firms require bond issuers to hold
: reserves, depleting them significantly could cause the authority’s
: bond rating, already just one step above junk status, to be
: downgraded. That would significantly darken the prospects for what
: authority officials acknowledge is the only long-term solution:
: refinancing.
: Authority officials are pinning their hopes on a pair of potential
: deals. The first would be a line of credit with JPMorgan to cover
: the $117 million. The second is another line of credit with UBS
: that would allow the authority to avoid paying the collateral on
: the swap.
: Both deals would greatly smooth out the authority’s financial
: challenges. But they also would force Harris County to grapple with
: an unexpected $7 million-a-year budget hole.
: To make the deals work, the authority would need to pledge more of
: the money from parking fees, the Houston Texans and the Houston
: Rodeo at Reliant Stadium for debt service. Currently, that money is
: used by the Harris County Sports and Convention Corporation for
: operating expenses and stadium maintenance.
: Additional millions
: Already, the authority’s fiscal woes have triggered a requirement
: that the sports corporation make a $2 million debt payment every
: six months from parking fees. If the deals go through, an
: additional $3.2 million a year of those funds also would be
: required, county and authority officials said.
: The Harris County Commissioners Court appeared to make its first
: move to fill that hole late last month, when it voted to transfer
: $2 million to the corporation to fill the budget gap left after its
: first payment.
: But the court today will consider rescinding that transfer because
: the authority did not ultimately need the first $2 million
: injection of cash as expected, said County Financial Services
: Director Edwin Harrison. Any county transfers to the sports
: corporation will come from hotel occupancy taxes, he said.
: Jack Yuran, director of financial planning in Harris County, said
: he and other officials are trying to come up with a way to free up
: additional hotel tax funds to make it possible for their use by the
: sports corporation.
: One possibility under consideration is to move stadium utility
: costs usually around $11 million a year from the HOT tax budget
: into the tax-supported general fund or a special revenue fund,
: Yuran said.
: Numerous county and authority officials insisted that the use of
: property tax funds to pay for expenses that were covered by money
: that will now go toward stadium debt does not represent a breach of
: the promises made to taxpayers.
: “We can never and we won’t use ad valorem taxes to pay for anything
: for Reliant Stadium,” Yuran said. “It’s not a likeable situation,
: but we’re working very diligently.”
: Former Harris County Tax Assessor-Collector Paul Bettencourt, a
: longtime critic of the stadium deals who has called for the
: authority to be dissolved, said those claims are misleading.
: “It’s literally like watching a train go over a hill,” he said.
: “The heavy engine goes over the hill first, and it pulls the whole
: train over, all the way to the caboose. Somebody’s going to pay at
: the end of this train, and that’s going to be the taxpayers.”
Mark Reiff
Tags: Harris County Sports Authority, Houston, Houston Voters, John Faulk, Sheila Jackson Lee, Taxes, Texas 18th Congressional District
Posted in Houston, John Faulk, Sheila Jackson Lee, Voices of the 18th Congressional District | 1 Comment »
Saturday, October 24th, 2009
by David Kreutzer, Ph.D.
Reps. Henry Waxman and Ed Markey did a little digging last week. It was the kind of thoughtful investigative work our lawmakers should do more often.
What Waxman and Markey did was ask The Heritage Foundation and six other outfits about the methodology they used in estimating the cost of their cap-and-trade bill. The bill authors sent an identical list of 33 methodological questions to each group probing both the analytical techniques used and the range of inquiry.
As they explained in their cover letter, they wanted to spark a transparent conversation about how these measures would affect American families. “[T]his transparency will allow members of Congress and the public to put model results in appropriate context.”
We were delighted to engage. Our study had reached conclusions not at all pleasant to the eyes of the bill sponsors. It showed that, when all the tax impacts were added up, the Waxman-Markey legislation would cost the average per-family-of-four cost almost $3,000 per year. Over the 2012-2035 time period, we forecast total per-family-of-four costs would tally roughly $71,500.
And economic costs extended far beyond that. Even after accounting for “green job” creation, our analysis predicted net job losses approaching 1.9 million in 2012 and 2.5 million by 2035. The manufacturing sector alone would lose 1.4 million jobs by 2035.
Doubtless these findings brought little joy to Congressmen Waxman and Markey. Yet the questions they asked about our research revealed no pique. Rather, they were totally legitimate.
Click here for full article
Posted in National Issues, The U.S. Government, Voices of the 18th Congressional District | No Comments »
Saturday, October 24th, 2009
Hill is Above the (Labor) Law (Heritage Foundation)
by Stuart M. Butler, Ph.D.
Most Americans think that all citizens should have the same rights and privileges, and that the same laws should apply equally to all. So it is that the president has just one vote in any election, as does the grocery clerk. And the Treasury secretary or chairman of the Ways and Means Committee must pay taxes just like anyone else (well, more or less).
But one powerful group in our democracy rarely misses a chance to exempt itself from laws that apply to the rest of us. We’re talking about members of Congress. Most seem to think it’s just too inconvenient to have to abide by those pesky laws they foist on the rest of us.
When the Republicans took control of the House in 1995, the very first item in their “Contract with America” was to “require all laws that apply to the rest of the country also apply equally to the Congress.” They did this because, until then, the offices of members of Congress were routinely exempt from the rules that applied to private-sector offices. For instance, lawmakers could run their offices with little regard to basic Occupational Safety and Health Administration safety standards, and some were like hazardous-waste dumps. Meanwhile, the laws they had passed imposed stiff fines on small businesses for even technical infractions.
While the most visible examples of “one rule for you and another for me” may have disappeared, flagrant examples remain. And more may be on the way. One of those involves the truckload of new rules Congress is now considering designed to boost flagging union membership that has slid to just 7.6 percent of the private-sector work force.
As my colleagues James Sherk and Ryan O’Donnell point out in a recent Heritage Foundation Backgrounder, many members of Congress can advocate new laws to push workers into joining unions with enthusiasm because their own congressional employees do not and will not have the right to form a union.
It is time for Congress to work under the same rules it imposes on the private sector. If members think that the burden of these unionization laws is not excessive, then they should apply them to their own offices. If they are not prepared to do that, they should not impose them on businesses in Main Street America.
Click here for full article
Tags: Barack Obama, Congress, Nancy Pelosi
Posted in National Issues, The U.S. Government, Voices of the 18th Congressional District | No Comments »
« Older Entries |