Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

« Older Entries |

Conservative vs. Liberal Beliefs

Friday, March 12th, 2010

StudentNewsDaily.com

CONSERVATIVES – believe in personal responsibility, limited government, free markets, individual liberty, traditional American values and a strong national defense.  Believe the role of government should be to provide people the freedom necessary to pursue their own goals.

Conservative policies generally emphasize empowerment of the individual to solve problems.

LIBERALS – believe in governmental action to achieve equal opportunity and equality for all, and that it is the duty of the State to alleviate social ills and to protect civil liberties and individual and human rights.  Believe the role of the government should be to guarantee that no one is in need.  Believe that people are basically good.

Liberal policies generally emphasize the need for the government to solve people’s problems.


THE ISSUES:

ISSUE CONSERVATIVE LIBERAL
Abortion Human life begins at conception.  Abortion is the murder of a human being. Nobody has the right to murder a human being.

Support legislation to prohibit partial birth abortions, called the “Partial Birth Abortion Ban” (partial birth abortion – the killing of an unborn baby of at least 20 weeks by pulling it out of the birth canal with forceps, but leaving the head inside.  An incision is made in the back of the baby’s neck and the brain tissue is suctioned out.  The head is then removed from the uterus.)

A fetus is not a human life.

The decision to have an abortion is a personal choice of a woman regarding her own body and the government should stay out of it.  Women should be guaranteed the right to a safe and legal abortion, including partial birth abortion.

Affirmative action People should be admitted to schools and hired for jobs based on their ability.  It is unfair to use race as a factor in the selection process.  Reverse-discrimination is not a solution for racism. Due to prevalent racism in the past, minorities were deprived of the same education and employment opportunities as whites.  We need to make up for that.

Support affirmative action based on the belief that America is still a racist society.  Minorities still lag behind whites in all statistical measurements of success.  Also, the presence of minorities creates diversity.

Death penalty The death penalty is a punishment that fits the crime; it is neither ‘cruel’ nor ‘unusual’.  Executing a murderer is the appropriate punishment for taking an innocent life. We should abolish the death penalty.  The death penalty is inhumane and is ‘cruel and unusual’ punishment.  It does not deter crime.  Imprisonment is the appropriate punishment.  Every execution risks killing an innocent person.
Economy The free market system, competitive capitalism, and private enterprise afford the widest opportunity and the highest standard of living for all.  Free markets produce more economic growth, more jobs and higher standards of living than those systems burdened by excessive government regulation. Favor a market system in which government regulates the economy.  We need government to protect us against big businesses.  Unlike the private sector, the government is motivated by public interest.  We need government regulation to level the playing field.
Education – school vouchers School vouchers will give all parents the right to choose good schools for their children, not just those who can afford private schools.  Parents (who pay the taxes that fund the schools) should decide how and where to educate their child. School vouchers are untested experiments.  We need to focus on more funding for existing public schools -to raise teacher salaries and reduce class size.
the Environment Desire clean water, clean air and a clean planet, just like everyone else.  However, extreme environmental policies destroy jobs and damage the economy.

Changes in global temperatures are natural over long periods of time.  So far, science has not shown that humans can affect permanent change to the earth’s temperature.

Conservatives don’t care about protecting the environment.
Industrial growth harms the environment.

Global warming is caused by an increased production of carbon dioxide.  The U.S. is a major contributor to global warming because it produces 25% of the world’s carbon dioxide.  The U.S. should enact laws to significantly reduce that amount.

Gun control The Second Amendment gives the individual the right to keep and bear arms.  Gun control laws do not thwart criminals.  You have a right to defend yourself against criminals.  More guns mean less crime. The Second Amendment gives no individual the right to own a gun, but allows the state to keep a militia (National Guard).  Guns kill people.  Guns kill children.
Health care Free healthcare provided by the government (socialized medicine) means that everyone will get the same poor-quality healthcare.  The rich will continue to pay for superior healthcare, while all others will receive poor-quality free healthcare from the government.  Health care should remain privatized.
Support Healthcare Spending Accounts.
Support universal government-supervised health care.  There are millions of Americans who can’t afford health insurance.  They are being deprived of a basic right to healthcare.
Homeland security Wary of parts of the Patriot Act Oppose the Patriot Act
Immigration Support legal immigration at current numbers, but do not support illegal immigration.   Government should enforce immigration laws.  Oppose President Bush’s amnesty plan for illegal immigrants.  Those who break the law by entering the U.S. illegally should not have the same rights as those who obey the law by entering legally.

If there were a decrease in cheap, illegal immigrant labor, employers would have to substitute higher-priced domestic employees, legal immigrants, or perhaps increase mechanization.

Support legal immigration and increasing the number of legal immigrants permitted to enter the U.S. each year.  Support blanket amnesty for current illegal immigrants.

Believe that regardless of how they came to the U.S., illegal immigrants deserve:
- U.S. government financial aid for college tuition.
- visas for spouse/children to come to the U.S.  Families shouldn’t be separated.

Illegal immigrants do the jobs that Americans do not want to do.

Religion The phrase “separation of church and state” is not in the Constitution.  The First Amendment to the Constitution states “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof…”  This prevents the government from establishing a national church.  However, it does not prevent God from being acknowledged in schools and government buildings.

Oppose the removal of symbols of Christian heritage from public and government spaces.

Government should not interfere with religion and religious freedom.

Support the separation of church and state.  Religious expression has no place in government.

Support the removal of all references to God in public and government spaces.

Religion should not interfere with government.

Same-sex marriage Marriage is between one man and one woman.

Opinions differ on support for the creation of a constitutional amendment establishing marriage as the union of one man and one woman.

Believe that requiring citizens to sanction same-sex relationships violates moral and religious beliefs of millions of Christians, Jews, Muslims and others who believe marriage is the union of a man and a woman.

Marriage should be legal for gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender couples to ensure equal rights for all.

All individuals, regardless of their sex, have the right to marry.

Believe that prohibiting same-sex citizens from marrying denies them of their civil rights.  Opinions differ on whether this issue is equal to civil rights for African Americans.

Social Security The current Social Security system is in serious financial trouble.  Changes are necessary because the U.S. will be unable to maintain the current system it in the future.  Support proposal to allow a portion of Social Security dollars withheld to be put into an account chosen by the individual, not the government. Generally oppose change to the current Social Security system.  Opinions vary on whether the current system is in financial trouble.  Changing the current system will cause people to lose their Social Security benefits.

Support a cap on Social Security payments to the wealthy.

Taxes Support lower taxes and a smaller government.  Lower taxes create more incentive for people to work, save, invest, and engage in entrepreneurial endeavors.  Money is best spent by those who earn it. Support higher taxes and a larger government.  High taxes enable the government to do good and create jobs.  We need high taxes for social welfare programs, to provide for the poor.  We can’t afford to cut taxes.
United Nations (UN) The UN has repeatedly failed in its essential mission:  to preserve world peace.  The wars, genocide and human rights abuses of the majority of its member states (and the UN’s failure to stop them) prove this point.  History shows that the United States, not the UN, is the global force for spreading freedom, prosperity, tolerance and peace.  The U.S. should never subvert its national interests to those of the UN. The United States has a moral and a legal obligation to support the United Nations (UN).  The UN can be effective in promoting peace and human rights.  The U.S. should not have acted in Iraq without UN approval.  The U.S. should submit its national interests to the greater good (as defined by the UN).
War in Iraq This was a preemptive strike to protect the U.S.  All intelligence indicated that Saddam Hussein possessed and used weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) in the past and was prepared to use them again.  He would not allow United Nations weapons inspectors to confirm his claim that he had destroyed his WMDs.
A democracy can succeed in Iraq if the people are given the opportunity to create one.  All people want to live in freedom.
This is Bush’s war for oil.  Saddam Hussein was no real threat.  We have not found weapons of mass destruction (WMDs), so Saddam did not have any.  President Bush lied about WMDs and the dangers posed by Saddam.  We should have given the UN more time.  We have alienated the rest of the world by our unilateral action (‘go it alone’ attitude).

A democracy can’t succeed in Iraq.  Not everyone wants to live in a democracy.

War on terror/terrorism The world toward which the Militant Islamists strive cannot peacefully co-exist with the Western world.  In the last decade, Militant Islamists have repeatedly attacked Americans and American interests here and abroad.  The terrorists must be stopped and destroyed. 9/11 was caused by America’s arrogant foreign policy.  America needs to stop angering other countries.  The threat posed by terrorism is exaggerated by President Bush for his own political advantage.
Welfare Oppose long-term welfare.  We need to provide opportunities to make it possible for poor and low-income workers to become self-reliant.  It is far more compassionate and effective to encourage a person to become self-reliant, rather than keeping them dependent on the government for money. Support welfare.  We need welfare to provide for the poor.  Conservatives oppose welfare because they are not compassionate toward the poor.  We have welfare to bring fairness to American economic life.  Without welfare, life below the poverty line would be intolerable.

StudentNewsDaily.com

Tags: , , , , ,
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

‘America Live’ Makes It to Late Night

Thursday, March 11th, 2010

\’America Live\’ Makes It to Late Night

Tags:
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

Redneck Tire Mounting [After a week of Serious Politics I Have To Add A Little Humor]

Thursday, March 11th, 2010

YouTube Preview Image

Green95Hoe July 20, 2006Mikes mounts a tire on the bead redneck style

Tags:
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

Democrats Reveal Facts About Health Care

Thursday, March 11th, 2010

The Fox Nation

YouTube Preview Image

Tags: , , , , , ,
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

BLUE DOGS CAVING on ObamaCare

Wednesday, March 10th, 2010

BLUE DOGS CAVING on ObamaCare; MELT THE PHONES
Teri Peters
MY picks : Call every Dem Please


http://tinyurl.com/yk586hs

Start With The House .. Make those cell phone bills count.

Tags: , , , , ,
Posted in National Issues, The U.S. Government, Uncategorized | No Comments »

Is Health Care a Right?

Wednesday, March 10th, 2010

Wednesday, March 10, 2010
Walter E. Williams :: Townhall.com Columnist
by Walter E. Williams

Most politicians, and probably most Americans, see health care as a right. Thus, whether a person has the means to pay for medical services or not, he is nonetheless entitled to them. Let’s ask ourselves a few questions about this vision.

Say a person, let’s call him Harry, suffers from diabetes and he has no means to pay a laboratory for blood work, a doctor for treatment and a pharmacy for medication. Does Harry have a right to XYZ lab’s and Dr. Jones’ services and a prescription from a pharmacist? And, if those services are not provided without charge, should Harry be able to call for criminal sanctions against those persons for violating his rights to health care?

You say, “Williams, that would come very close to slavery if one person had the right to force someone to serve him without pay.” You’re right. Suppose instead of Harry being able to force a lab, doctor and pharmacy to provide services without pay, Congress uses its taxing power to take a couple of hundred dollars out of the paycheck of some American to give to Harry so that he could pay the lab, doctor and pharmacist. Would there be any difference in principle, namely forcibly using one person to serve the purposes of another? There would be one important strategic difference, that of concealment. Most Americans, I would hope, would be offended by the notion of directly and visibly forcing one person to serve the purposes of another. Congress’ use of the tax system to invisibly accomplish the same end is more palatable to the average American.

True rights, such as those in our Constitution, or those considered to be natural or human rights, exist simultaneously among people. That means exercise of a right by one person does not diminish those held by another. In other words, my rights to speech or travel impose no obligations on another except those of non-interference. If we apply ideas behind rights to health care to my rights to speech or travel, my free speech rights would require government-imposed obligations on others to provide me with an auditorium, television studio or radio station. My right to travel freely would require government-imposed obligations on others to provide me with airfare and hotel accommodations.

For Congress to guarantee a right to health care, or any other good or service, whether a person can afford it or not, it must diminish someone else’s rights, namely their rights to their earnings. The reason is that Congress has no resources of its very own. Moreover, there is no Santa Claus, Easter Bunny or Tooth Fairy giving them those resources. The fact that government has no resources of its very own forces one to recognize that in order for government to give one American citizen a dollar, it must first, through intimidation, threats and coercion, confiscate that dollar from some other American. If one person has a right to something he did not earn, of necessity it requires that another person not have a right to something that he did earn.

To argue that people have a right that imposes obligations on another is an absurd concept. A better term for new-fangled rights to health care, decent housing and food is wishes. If we called them wishes, I would be in agreement with most other Americans for I, too, wish that everyone had adequate health care, decent housing and nutritious meals. However, if we called them human wishes, instead of human rights, there would be confusion and cognitive dissonance. The average American would cringe at the thought of government punishing one person because he refused to be pressed into making someone else’s wish come true.

None of my argument is to argue against charity. Reaching into one’s own pockets to assist his fellow man in need is praiseworthy and laudable. Reaching into someone else’s pockets to do so is despicable and deserves condemnation.

Tags: , , , , , , ,
Posted in National Issues, The U.S. Government, Uncategorized | No Comments »

Let Freedom Ring!

Tuesday, March 9th, 2010

YouTube Preview Image

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

They Lie: Abortion In Obamacare

Monday, March 8th, 2010

Townhall.com The Blogspot for Political, Conservative and Republican Blogs and Bloggers

Monday, March 08, 2010

Posted by: Greg Hengler at 1:28 PM
Here’s a short video I put together over the weekend. Whether you are pro-life or pro-abortion, there’s no way you can deny that Obama and Pelosi are lying. Unfortunately, the political game guarantees that more people will hear the lies from our President and Speaker of the House than those who will see the abortion clause in the bill. Well, here’s a chance to see it for yourself:



p. 2071 in the bill.  We posted the .pdf file on this website on Saturday morning March 6, 2010.

Tags: , , , , , ,
Posted in National Issues, The U.S. Government, Uncategorized | No Comments »

SNL on Wolf Blitzer: ‘Such an Exciting Name for Such a Boring Man’

Sunday, March 7th, 2010

Newsbusters



[Humor]

Newsbusted Eyeblast.TV



SNL Mocks Wolf Blitzer


Tags: , ,
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

A Couple More National Health Service Stories; The System We Are Going To Emulate

Saturday, March 6th, 2010

Neglected by ‘lazy’ nurses, man, 22, dying of thirst rang the police to beg for water

By Emily Andrews
Last updated at 2:19 PM on 06th March 2010

A man of 22 died in agony of dehydration after three days in a leading teaching hospital.

Kane Gorny was so desperate for a drink that he rang police to beg for their help.

They arrived on the ward only to be told by doctors that everything was under control.

The next day his mother Rita Cronin found him delirious and he died within hours.

She said nurses had failed to give him vital drugs which controlled fluid levels in his body. ‘He was totally dependent on the nurses to help him and they totally betrayed him.’

Kane Gorny, aged 11
Kane, aged 11. He worked for Waitrose and had been a keen footballer and runner until he was diagnosed with a brain tumour the year before his death

A coroner has such grave concerns about the case that it has been referred to police.

Sources say they are investigating the possibility of a corporate manslaughter charge against St George’s Hospital in Tooting, South London.

Read more:

Annals of Government Medicine

March 6, 2010 Posted by John at 7:16 PM

From the Daily Telegraph in London: “Ministers ignored safety warnings for years over children’s heart surgery.”

Ministers dismissed a warning in 2003 by the UK’s most senior heart surgeon that half of Britain’s units should be closed. As President of the Society for Cardiothoracic Surgeons (SCTS) of Great Britain and Ireland, Prof James Monro was commissioned by ministers to propose changes following the Bristol inquiry, yet “the Government did absolutely nothing” about his key demand, he told The Sunday Telegraph;

Sir Bruce Keogh, medical director of the health service, told NHS bosses two years ago that he feared “another Bristol” tragedy because specialists were so thinly spread;

The consultant told this newspaper “there has been frankly little progress” reorganising services to make them safer since the public inquiry reported in 2001. Sir Bruce recently told colleagues that failing to make changes now would leave “a stain on the soul” of his profession.

Britain’s leading children’s heart charity says Labour ministers “ran scared” from introducing an overhaul of the specialist system which could have saved lives, and prevented major disabilities.

The public inquiry into the Bristol heart deaths scandal was the most damning in the history of the NHS.

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

Sarah Palin: An Unexpected Encounter

Saturday, March 6th, 2010

Read this nice post about Sarah Palin then read the follow up post below it.

Photo

Yesterday a friend and I had a meeting together in the valley.  I arrived before he did, so I decided to sit outside and wait since it was such a beautiful day.  As I sat in the sun, I saw a women chatting with a gentleman a few feet away.  I thought I recognized her, but was not sure.

I saw my friend approaching, so I got up and walked towards him.  As I passed the woman, I got a good look and realized I was looking at Sarah Palin.  I hugged my friend and we turned to walk into the building.  I then stopped, turned around, and walked back towards her.

Let me begin by saying that Sarah Palin is beautiful.  Not just pretty, but beautiful.  She has great hair, fabulous teeth, magnificent skin, and a killer body.  She is tiny, feminine, and stunning.  She is very approachable, so I decided to introduce myself, and say hello.

She was standing there with Mark Burnett, who I think is fabulous.  We all know I am a reality television junky, and think he is King, but I was so blown away by how much fun she was to talk to, that I barely said hello to a man who I think totally rocks.  Note to self for next time, never give up an opportunity to talk to Mark Burnett.

To clarify, I don’t agree with her politics.  We are polar opposite in terms of our political, and religious views.  That said, her politics and beliefs have nothing to do with my blog. This is America and she can believe what she wants, as can everyone else, myself included.  I approached her because I like her as a woman.  We are both ballsy ladies, and mothers.

I introduced myself and told her that I thought she was entertaining on Leno the night before.  I don’t actually watch Leno, and never will again, but I had seen a ton of clips online.  Sidebar:  Jay Leno is a baby, and a putz, and I hope Conan has sweet success and revenge.

Rest of it is here.

Now read what happened to her for liking Sarah:

Friday, March 5, 2010

Liberal who defended Sarah Palin gets lots of hate mail

*
Ilana Angel, a liberal Democrat who had a chance encounter with Sarah Palin and blogged about it, was on the receiving end of an e-mail tsunami because she said that despite their political differences, she found Gov. Palin to be a nice person, and she liked her. In a follow-up post, Ilana discusses the responses she received, which generally fell into two camps:


Conservatives wrote fast and furious to let me know they respected the bravery of my article, considering I was not a supporter of Sarah as a politician. I think it’s a sad day in America when people feel the need to commend you for being decent.

Liberals wrote to say that I took my picture with Hitler, was fraternizing with the enemy, and should be ashamed of myself. Six of my “friends” were so disgusted with my blog, that they decided to “un-friend” me on Facebook.

Tags:
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

Hundreds of NHS wards to be shut in secret plans

Friday, March 5th, 2010

Plans that could lead to the closure of hundreds of hospital wards are being drawn up but will not be made public until after the general election, opposition parties have said.


By Robert Winnett, Holly Watt and Christopher Hope
Published: 10:01PM GMT 05 Mar 2010

Opposition parties have claimed that health authorities were  considering closing or merging key hospital departments

A lack of privacy and dignity is one of the most common complaints made to the NHS Photo: PA

Last year, the Government asked NHS authorities to come up with proposals to reorganise the service to save money as a result of the recession. Details have started to emerge of what is likely to be a rolling programme of cuts that contrasts sharply with assurances from Labour and the Tories that the NHS was “safe”.

So far, only the plans for London have come to light. Campaigners claimed the proposals threatened services such as casualty and maternity units at 13 out of 36 hospitals in the capital.

The failure of health authorities in other areas to disclose their response has prompted allegations that proposed closures, which could be politically damaging to the Government, will not be published until after polling day.

The scale of the cuts has caused a rebellion among Labour ministers who have openly defied the Government by publicly protesting at closures at their local hospitals.

Next week, health ministers will come under pressure from the Conservatives and Liberal Democrats to disclose the scale of the plans, with the Tories calling an emergency debate on the issue.

Norman Lamb, the Liberal Democrats’ shadow health spokesman, said the scale of the cuts to hospitals was likely to be “vast”, with potentially “hundreds” of wards closing.

He said: “The Government will be desperate to avoid these cuts ahead of an election. We could end up with the threat of cuts to services being a key issue in the election campaign. The electorate will feel conned if they come out after the campaign.

“It is hard to judge the scale of this but it could be vast. It could be hundreds [of wards]. The savings they have to achieve are enormous. What has emerged in London could be the tip of the iceberg and the public is unaware of the scale of potential cuts.”

Mike Penning, the Tory shadow minister for health in London, said: “I see no reason why these reports cannot be published before the election. Labour must be straight with people about the cuts that they are planning to make to their local NHS.”

The cutbacks are partly as a result of Lord Darzi’s 2008 review of the NHS, which recommended more community based treatment in large GP centres and bigger, specialist treatment centres in hospitals.

Authorities were asked by the Department of Health to draw up plans to implement Lord Darzi’s review. But last year, they were told to reconsider their proposals after the recession.

Opposition parties have claimed that health authorities were considering closing or merging key hospital departments, many of which have received millions of pounds in investment in recent years.

The NHS is coming under pressure to find other savings despite government claims that the health service would be protected from widespread public spending cuts.

In this month’s budget, Alistair Darling, the Chancellor, is expected to announce that the NHS will have to find savings of up to £10 billion a year. Liam Byrne, a Treasury minister, said last month that hospital buildings were likely to be mothballed as services were moved to community based health centres.

Dr John Lister, the author of the British Medical Association’s recent report on the plans, described the scale of the cuts being proposed as “a disaster”.

Threatened hospital closures are likely to become one of the key election issues.

Labour ministers and MPs faced claims of hypocrisy after starting pre-election campaigns to block closures at their local hospitals. Ministers were pictured protesting against closures and writing to residents setting out their opposition. Many fear they will lose their seats if they are seen to back government policy.

Last weekend, David Lammy, the Higher Education minister, was joined by other local Labour MPs when he led a march to “save” the Whittington Hospital casualty department in north London.

The Whittington also faces cuts to maternity services, although £600,000 of public money was recently spent on its new birth centre. Other high-profile Labour MPs campaigning to protect hospitals in their constituencies include Margaret Hodge, the Culture and Tourism Minister who represents the marginal seat of Barking. She has led a campaign to save the Accident and Emergency unit at King George Hospital in Ilford.

Mike Gapes, the Labour MP for Ilford South, also backs the campaign. “I will fight a Labour government, a Conservative government or a Martian government to keep a hospital in my constituency,” he said yesterday.

Last night, Andrew Lansley, the shadow health secretary, said: “Labour MPs are campaigning on a general election manifesto which would lead to the first cuts to the NHS budget for years, but yet they still try to portray themselves as local champions by protesting against cuts in their own backyards.”

A department spokesman said any discussion of the scale of cuts was “speculation”. The local NHS plans would be published after the budget, she said. “These are tough times and we are committed to continuous improvement in efficiency. The NHS locally is best placed to identify savings based on their circumstances and priorities.

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

« Older Entries |